I have been administering Citrix severs for over 16 years.\u00a0 The first Citrix system I managed was a Winframe server to publish an accounting package for Analytical Surveys Inc. some time around 1995 on a Windows NT 4.0 domain.\u00a0 Citrix proceeded to be the go to company for remote application deployment.\u00a0 Ask any Citrix admin what the biggest set back of Citrix has always been and they will all give the same answer: Printing, no doubt about it.<\/p>\n
So what did Citrix do to fix these printing issues producing some of the greatest administrative overhead in the history of application deployment?\u00a0 Almost nothing that made a difference.\u00a0 They added Universal Print Drivers<\/em> several years ago, touting them as an end to the printing nightmare.\u00a0 Since then nothing much has changed.\u00a0 Big environments tended to move towards third party utilities like Tricerat’s Screw Drivers<\/em>.\u00a0 What did Citrix embark on for revenue instead of working on the core problems of it’s primary server components?\u00a0 They decided to enter the SaaS market and gave us GoToDamnNearAnything<\/em>.\u00a0 You know GoToMyPC, GoToAssist, GoToMeeting etc.\u00a0\u00a0 Then they decided virtualization was their future and took on competing with VMWare.\u00a0 When they woke up the Citrix honchos decided they would “compliment” VMWare.\u00a0 All this while creating enough product name changes to keep veteran Citrix Admins and VAR’s guessing what to buy.\u00a0 Metaframe became Presentation Server.\u00a0 Presentation Server became XenApp.\u00a0 I seem to remember a Novel XenServer and can’t help but wonder where they got such an original branding idea.<\/p>\n So now I’m trying to take a Presentation Server 4.5 farm to XenApp 6.\u00a0 Nothing is compatible.\u00a0 Citrix has expanded the services installed with their basic app publication product from seven to about fifteen running services.\u00a0 The bloat is absolutely astounding.\u00a0 Starting with a clean Windows 2008 R2 server, from scratch, you would think I would not run into many compatibility issues out of the box.\u00a0 Not so fast.\u00a0 First, XenApp6 is not compatible with any previous versions of Citrix server farms.\u00a0 So a new farm must be created.\u00a0 Then it’s time to provide access to the old applications from Presentation Server using the new XenApp “Web Interface” component.\u00a0 Well, it did not run out of the box and provided a nice generic message in the MMC saying the “correct version of Web interface is not installed”.\u00a0 Never mind it’s the latest version available from the Citrix download site.\u00a0 Even more fun, it won’t uninstall and doesn’t provide a reason other than “Web Interface setup ended prematurely because of an error”.\u00a0 Well, at least it was informative.\u00a0 I’m guessing it’s all based upon some vaguely published IIS 7 requirements.<\/p>\n All this hassle for what???\u00a0 The answer is almost as bad as the Citrix product line has become.\u00a0 As of right now Citrix is the only company providing a Windows server based product that will publish individual applications to users with user level security<\/em>.\u00a0 Windows Server 2008 Remote Desktop services will now publish individual applications.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The only piece that’s missing is user level security to each app.\u00a0 That is the sole reason we still have a Citrix component in play on our network.\u00a0 A $9300 component for 30 users.<\/p>\n Citrix better come up with a stream lined, viable, affordable product quick or like many admins I will work diligently to remove them from the environment for the first time in my career.\u00a0 Citrix can press on as the GoTo kids.\u00a0 They are getting hurt in that area as well because of cost.\u00a0 A product like GoToAssist can be replaced with a less expensive alternative such as Elsinore Technologies Screenconnect<\/a> for a fraction of the subscription cost.\u00a0 Also, Citrix has not adapted well the to mobile market space.\u00a0 They have very convoluted web interface requirements through products like Access Gateway<\/em> that get so specific Android and iPhones apps struggle to connect until major back end server changes are implemented.<\/p>\n In short, Citrix products have just become too version incompatible and administratively complicated to justify their usefulness in the toolbox.\u00a0 Add the insane annual Subscription Advantage<\/em> price structure and I can assure you even the largest enterprises will start looking for alternatives as they become available.\u00a0 If Microsoft adds user level security for remote applications in any upcoming service pack or server releases it will be a the gut punch that leaves Citrix struggling to get up from the floor.\u00a0\u00a0 How certain am I of this future?\u00a0 CTXS is one long time stock leaving my portfolio.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I have been administering Citrix severs for over 16 years.\u00a0 The first Citrix system I managed was a Winframe server to publish an accounting package for Analytical Surveys Inc. some time around 1995 on a Windows NT 4.0 domain.\u00a0 Citrix proceeded to be the go to company for remote application deployment.\u00a0 Ask any Citrix admin … Continue reading Why Citrix Systems might Fail<\/span>