Here’s another email between an EDI Analyst and a map developer regarding an SPS customers documents after they made the choice to let SPS hijack their customer base for an ineffective testing ransom. Will it ever stop? Will the incompetence and gouging ever be outed?
Hi Margarita,
We’re still trying to sort out the issues we’re having with these ALL*** Invoices since switching to their new connection.
We received the below communication from them advising the required freight charges are not showing on the 810 and that these should come through the SAC loop. The Specs for this is attached for your reference.
I’m not sure why this is happening? as I copied the Tested TP kit when switching to their new EDI Connection. So everything that was tested and confirmed as passed should match. I’m beginning to think SPSCommerce did a poor job with handling ALL***’s document testing because when I look back to TEST invoices, none of them included this SAC segment. Therefor it should have failed during the testing period.
Reminder: We do not receive POs via EDI for this TP.
TDOC Name: ALL_810_4010X_TRIM2
Example of 810 (All Pro New)
ISA*00* *00* *01*044381234 *ZZ*ALLPROCORP *180105*1008*U*00401*000000036*0*P*>
GS*IN*044381234*ALLPROCORP*20180105*1008*70*X*004010
ST*810*000000005
BIG*20171229*INV0670665*20171228*366884***DI
REF*SW*SOD0141885
N1*SE*Trimaco, LLC*92*7950
N1*BY*Miller Paint Co. – AllPro*92*5240
N4*Puyallup*WA*98373-2414**SN*0195
N1*ST*Miller Paint Co. – AllPro
N3*14207 Meridian E*Bldg C
N4*Puyallup*WA*98373-2414
ITD*01**2*20180128***0*****2% EOM/Net 15th
DTM*011*20171231
IT1**64*EA*8.85**MG*84075*BP*84075
CTP***8.85
PID*F****One Tuff Wiping Cloth 75/box 8bx/cs
TDS*69647
CTT*1
SE*17*000000005
Thank you,
Desireé ******* | Systems Analyst – EDI | *******, LLC
D: ***.***.***